• Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Xing
+49 7353 981781
Heicon Ulm
  • HOME
  • COMPANY
  • PRODUCTS
  • HEICON BLOG
  • English
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Menu Menu
You are here: Home1 / FuSa__General2 / Importance of Tool Qualification in the FuSa (part 1)!

Importance of Tool Qualification in the FuSa (part 1)!

FuSa__General

Importance of Tool Qualification : Many companies and project teams that carry out projects for the first time in the field of functional safety have the impression that the tool qualification is critical to success and involves a great deal of effort. Although the Importance of Tool Qualification is justified, the subject is interestingly often given an not adequate attention.
This effect is very similar in several, very different industries such as aerospace, automotive or industrial automation.
The following article (part 1) therefore deals with this topic. Part 2 can be found here: Tool qualification – The phantom pain of functional safety (part 2)!

Basic idea behind the tool qualification

The 4-eyes principle is an essential aspect of functional safety in order to minimize systematic errors. When tools are deployed and they perform verification, they are an integral part of the 4-eyes principle. An example of this is the automated verification of the coding guidelines. If the tool does not recognize a violation of the rules, then this error will not be detected.

Tools can not detect errors in a system. Of course, mistakes of a tool which can introduce failure into the system are even more serious. An example is the compiler for the software. It is obvious that special requirements apply to this type of tools, unless there is a process that can detect these errors. For both categories of tools the violation of the 4 eye principle justifies the Importance of Tool Qualification.

Measures

The following measures are generally applied to demonstrate the correct functionality of tools:

  • Data from the historical use of the tool
  • Assessment of the development process of the tool
  • Test the functionality of the tool
  • Complete development of the tool according to a standard of functional safety

The two factors determining which measures are to be applied are the best practises of the industry as well as the criticality level of the functional safety system.
If these aspects are adequately taken into account and the resulting measures are implemented, the topic of tool qualification completely loses its fright. The sector-specific measures and best practices are dealt with in the second part of the blog.

Further HEICON Blog Posts related to Tool Qualification

  • Tool qualification – The pain of functional safety (part 2)!
  • IEC 61508 – Tool qualification – When? Why? How?
  • EN50128 and EN50657 support tools
  • ISO 26262 Confidence in the use of software tools – A feasible strategy!

Are you ready for a functional safety workshop, to analyse improvement potentials in your development process, then send a mail to: info[at]heicon-ulm.de or call +49 (0) 7353 981 781.

31. October 2016/1 Comment/by HEICON Global Engineering GmbH
Tags: CENELEC, en 50657, EN50128, Functional Safety, IEC61508, ISO26262, RTCA DO178, Tool Qualification
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on LinkedIn
https://heicon-ulm.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/DI1A6023_klein_Functional_Safety.jpg 433 547 HEICON Global Engineering GmbH https://heicon-ulm.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/heicon-logo-5.png HEICON Global Engineering GmbH2016-10-31 21:59:012021-02-03 21:49:27Importance of Tool Qualification in the FuSa (part 1)!
You might also like
Functional Safety Structural Source Code Coverage – Cost without benefit?
Requirement Engineering Requirement Categories – Why they are useful?
Requirement Engineering How many level of Software requirements are necessary and useful?
Requirement Engineering User Stories – The better Requirements?
Railway EN 50129 Safety Case
Other Functional Safety Standards ISO 25119: Software Development for Tractors and Machinery for agriculture and forestry
1 reply

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Compiler for safety critical software – What needs to be done? | HEICON says:
    11. September 2017 at 8:48

    […] special requirements apply for the tools used during the development (see also tool qualification blog 1 and blog 2). The compiler plays a special role here. On the one hand, it is the central tool for […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • A_Requirement Engineering
  • B_Validation and Verification
  • C_Config- / Change Management
  • D_Security
  • FuSa__General
  • FuSa_Aerospace
  • FuSa_Agriculture
  • FuSa_Automotive
  • FuSa_Industrial
  • FuSa_Railway

Contact

HEICON Global Engineering GmbH
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Martin Heininger
Kreuzweg 22
88477 Schwendi

Phone: +49 7353 – 98 17 81
Mobile: +49 176 – 24 73 99 60

Email: info[at]heicon-ulm.de

IMPRINT  |  DATA PROTECTION

Requirement/Code Reviews – The better TDD?Requirement EngineeringFunctional SafetyTool qualification – The pain of functional safety (part 2)!
Scroll to top